pazyryk carpet::By reference to other objects found in the tomb, it has been dated to the 4th century bc pazyryk carpet

pazyryk carpet

pazyryk carpet

pazyryk carpet::By reference to other objects found in the tomb, it has been dated to the 4th century bc.
The drawing, especially that of the border frieze with its elks and horses and riders, also contradicts the idea that this carpet might be an example dating from the beginnings of knottedpile weaving.
So far, we only have contradictory opinions as to its place of origin.
The style of the drawing corresponds to the art of the achaemenian period in persia.
Up to now it represents the only complete oriental knottedpile carpet known to have survived from the preislamic period, and it is stylistically of a very high standard.
It already shows the principles of surface composition for a carpet: a repeat pattern in the inner field and a border composed of a number of stripes.
There are no examples of knotted carpets from the next goo years.
At the beginning of the 2cth century, sir aurel stein and a.
Von lecoq undertook several expeditions to central asia, with turfan as their main objective.
Of the tiny carpet fragments they brought back, four are now in the victoria and albert museum, one in the british museum6 and several more in the national museum of india in new delhi.
A fragment which was in berlin, where it was published by f.
Sarre, is now missing.
The fragment, which measures 26 x 116 cm, does not reveal a recognizable design.
The wool warp is thin.
There are s 7 wefts between the rows of knots, which explains the coarse structure.
What remains of the design section shows only various horizontal stripes, one of which has lozengeshaped elements.
The range of colors is surprisingly wide and includes up to twelve shades.
The suggested date is between the 3rd and 6th century.
No attempt has been made to date the pieces more precisely.
There is no reason to think that the carpets may have been imported into the area.
During the same period, felt carpets were in use, the designs of which were created by filling unspun wool into wool felt.
Examples of this technique were found at the same sites.
The occurrence at the same time of felt carpets and of the much more laborintensive knotted pile carpets is surprising.
However, a parallel is found in turkestan carpets of the 19th20th century which were also made in the same two techniques.
This simultaneous use of two techniques makes it more difficult to assess the floor carpets depicted on the turfan frescoes, which had already been referred to by sarre.
It is impossible to decide whether these paintings show knotted carpets, felts or possibly silk textiles.
The designs vary between spiraling vines, some symmetrically and others randomly arranged over the ground, rows of stripes, fourpealed rosettes which cover the ground, and concentric segments of circles in a tile pattern, resembling waves of water.
One of the frescoes has a particular bearing on the socalled chintamani design which was very popular in turkey in the 16th and 17th centuries.
This consists of three balls arranged in a triangle with two parallel curved stripes.
There is no evidence suggesting the use of a knotting technique.
It is a significant fact for the history of carpets that knotted pile carpets were in use in central asia in the 3rd to 6th centuries, which in technique were far behind the stage of development of the pazyryk carpet.
The designs, as they appear from the small fragments, were simple, although the wide color spectrum suggests greater experience.
There is a double degree of uncertainty about the smallest of the carpet fragments, known as fustat fragments.
They are so tiny that it is virtually impossible to recognize a pattern.
pazyryk carpet::There are several different archeological findings that
prove to us that the art of weaving and tying to create a rug is
something that has been around for thousands of years pazyryk carpet